Post by account_disabled on Mar 9, 2024 12:35:18 GMT 8
This Monday (October ) it was announced that Esther Duflo , the great scholar of the economics of poverty and public policies, won the Nobel Prize in Economics. The Swedish Academy explained that it made its decision because of “the experimental approach to combating poverty” that Duflo, his colleague Abhijit Banerjee and Michael Kremer have used and promoted in the last two or three decades. Duflo is the youngest person and only the second woman to win the Nobel Prize in economics, and in fact she has a lot in common with Elinor Ostrom, the first to receive the award. Like her, she has been the champion not only of a new approach to economics, but also of new themes and new dimensions of that discipline, which contribute to anchoring it to the earthly, to the real.
In the Nobel Prize for Esther Duflo we must not only celebrate the award for a revolutionary economist and the study of poverty and its solutions. We must also celebrate that Iraq Telegram Number Data a prominent place is given to those dimensions of the economy that are often forgotten: interactions at the local level, the mechanisms by which economic phenomena operate – including public policies – and the way out of poverty. Both Ostrom and Duflo have addressed topics that have traditionally been left aside in economic science: collective action and poverty, respectively. It is not surprising that women were awarded for this, since they are two areas that can only be fully understood from feminized perspectives, because they are anchored.
In the land and in daily life, and because they imply attention. to care, solidarity and ties with the other – something very foreign to heteropatriarchal sensitivity. One of the articles that launched Duflo to stardom explained precisely how the presence of women in politics changes the way it is exercised and the issues that are given importance. This is a study in which she and Raghabendra Chattopadhyay showed that in India, female mayors gave priority to issues related to tasks assigned to women, such as water infrastructure, unlike men. Something similar happens everywhere and at all levels. Economics – which, like all disciplines, has always been dominated by men – has dealt little with “feminine” aspects of the way in which societies deal with the scarcity of resources and life in general.
In the Nobel Prize for Esther Duflo we must not only celebrate the award for a revolutionary economist and the study of poverty and its solutions. We must also celebrate that Iraq Telegram Number Data a prominent place is given to those dimensions of the economy that are often forgotten: interactions at the local level, the mechanisms by which economic phenomena operate – including public policies – and the way out of poverty. Both Ostrom and Duflo have addressed topics that have traditionally been left aside in economic science: collective action and poverty, respectively. It is not surprising that women were awarded for this, since they are two areas that can only be fully understood from feminized perspectives, because they are anchored.
In the land and in daily life, and because they imply attention. to care, solidarity and ties with the other – something very foreign to heteropatriarchal sensitivity. One of the articles that launched Duflo to stardom explained precisely how the presence of women in politics changes the way it is exercised and the issues that are given importance. This is a study in which she and Raghabendra Chattopadhyay showed that in India, female mayors gave priority to issues related to tasks assigned to women, such as water infrastructure, unlike men. Something similar happens everywhere and at all levels. Economics – which, like all disciplines, has always been dominated by men – has dealt little with “feminine” aspects of the way in which societies deal with the scarcity of resources and life in general.